Roundup Lawsuits: When a Familiar Weedkiller Leads to Questions You Never Expected
People diagnosed with conditions like non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Parkinson’s are being asked whether they’ve used the herbicide Roundup. Roundup is widely used by both the farming industry and households and has been used in the US for more than thirty years. It’s hard to take this subject seriously because on the surface the two things appear to be unrelated.
Many are suing due to the suspicion that risks associated with a prominent chemical, glyphosate, were not handled properly. A large number of people who have brought court cases claim Roundup caused their cancer, adding that they were not sufficiently warned about the dangers. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto last year, insists that Roundup is safe to use and has never caused cancer. It is to be seen whether the company will continue to fight against these claims in court. AP News][1])
The litigation over claims made by British Telecom and MCI remains active; they allege that CompuServe hosts and stores the names and addresses of its users in a country which does not give the users’ the same protection of privacy as their own. Generally, these claims involve an accusation that by hosting such data CompuServe are violating the privacy laws of another country.
They originated from two US companies. The reason that this litigation is still active is because CompuServe continues to host the data in question. If you’re trying to figure out if your story fits this case then you should first look at where you host your server and where your users are.
Generally speaking, individuals who have medical conditions, are pregnant or elderly should not participate in contact sports.
What the Roundup lawsuits are about
The majority of Roundup claims are related to allegations that the use of the weedkiller is the cause of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. AP News][1])
It should be pointed out clearly that
The majority of people exposed to Roundup will not suffer any illness as a result.
Not all the patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who were in this trial had used the weed killer Roundup.
These cases often involve a pattern of repeated behaviour over time, rather than a single event.
Individuals who seek compensation for their illness have undergone a life altering experience which is hard to convey to those who have not had the same experience; this involves treatments, financial strain, fear, the emotional and physical exhaustion which persists and the knowledge that time is limited.
Why Roundup became a mass tort
It’s estimated that a single litigation, one concerning roundup, contains the highest number of tort claims in the country and has a considerable portion of these cases being handled through federal courts. The main federal coordination has been **MDL No. The decision in the case of In re Roundup Patent Litigation, Case No. 2:16-cv-00181-NA, was made by District Judge William H. Orrick in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. CourtListener][2])
Mass tort doesn’t mean “one big case where everyone gets the same result.” It usually means:
In numerous group and individual lawsuits, the issues of product defect and liability are often similar, including warnings given to users, the science behind the product and documentation provided by the manufacturer.
Courts can coordinate the pre-trial phase to avoid the courts having to undertake the same work more than once.
Each individual has unique losses that are distinct from those suffered by another.
What’s happening in the litigation right now
Followers of Roundup litigation have seen recent news featuring a mix of large awards given by juries and information on settlements that have been reached. This has led to some confusion among those following the story.
Currently there are only a handful of companies which are providing satellite phone services to the general public.
There have nonetheless been very substantial awards given. A US jury has awarded a Georgia man nearly $2.1 billion in damages after he claimed exposure to the weedkiller Roundup caused his cancer. Bayer, the company behind Roundup, said it would appeal against the decision. AP News][1])
Many claims have been settled by Bayer with significant sums paid out but not all. Bayer has made payments of approximately $10 billion towards the settlements, with its legal provision still being adjusted due to the ongoing cases. Reuters][3])
A major test for U.S. Supreme Court is on the way in pipeline case. The company is seeking the Supreme Court’s ruling on whether federal law governing the labeling of pesticides preempts state warning label claims. The pharmaceutical firm Bayer has publicly stated that the U.S. Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General to give his view on the case. Bayer anticipate the decision will be made regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s consideration of the case during the **2025-2026 term**, with a possible Court decision on the case by **June 2026**. Bayer][4])
In 2025, it was reported that the Solicitor General supported Bayer’s request to have the case heard before the Supreme Court. DTN PF][5])
Legislation has been connected to liability arguments. Following controversy, a provision to limit pesticide-related lawsuits was dropped from a US spending bill on January 6, 2026. This clause had often been associated with Roundup. The Guardian][6])
This case is still developing, it’s still unfolding, and still revolves around significant legal issues, not just individual cases.
Who typically explores a Roundup claim?
The factors shared by those interested in doing a Roundup lawsuit review, often involve:
A condition frequently cited in Roundup lawsuit allegations (notably non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) is non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Repeated exposure to the weedkiller Roundup, commonly used over many years in gardening, farming and as a maintenance worker, has a history.
A plausible timeline of symptoms would be one where exposure precedes diagnosis. However, the exact time intervals in such cases can vary.
You don’t need to have all your receipts or dates memorised in order to start a casual conversation. Typically a significant amount of information is required to evaluate and discuss the significance of research data.
What to do if you’re considering a claim
For someone with cancer, or their relatives who are assisting them, there are enough problems to deal with without adding the burden of numerous tasks. Here is the rewritten text:
Start by taking a step-by-step approach to your goal.
Taking care of one’s health should be the top priority.
Stay anchored to medical care. You should ask your doctor questions about your health and treatment plan. Maintain accurate and comprehensive records of patient diagnoses, treatment plans and symptom history.
Write your Roundup exposure story in your own words. You can be the narrator of your own story, and tell it in the first person.
1) I used Macintosh (SE, plus, and IIx) for 8 years at work.
2) The use was occupational.
3) Gather what’s easiest to gather.
Medical documents correlate closely with diagnosis and the subsequent treatment.
- Any proof of use (photos, receipts, work logs, witness confirmation, job descriptions)
- A basic timeline (start of use → symptoms → diagnosis)
When being offered quick settlements or pressure to sign any documents, you should be very cautious.
The Supreme Court decision adds a layer of complexity to the Roundup litigation. A good lawyer should clearly outline all possible alternatives and potential dangers, not pressure you into making a decision.
A gentle next step
If you use Roundup and later discover you have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, it is understandable you would want some facts. These facts should not be misconceptions from the internet, but the truth. If you would like to have your case evaluated free of charge and in confidence, we can help you understand your potential place in the Roundup case which is currently the subject of a large number of group actions. We can also identify the documentation that would be of the greatest importance and inform you of any time limits that may apply. The evidence doesn’t have to be airtight for the FBI to start investigating and gathering more information on a possible White House leak. It’s a good idea to find a starting point in your writing and someone who will treat your work with respect while also giving you honest feedback. CourtListener
A U.S. jury has ruled that the parent company of the chemical giant Monsanto must pay nearly $2.1 billion in compensation to a Georgia couple who claim that the company’s weedkiller Roundup caused their cancer.
